The Barbers encounter the Rifkins at Whole Foods
Defending JacobThe Barbers encounter the Rifkins at Whole Foods shortly before Labor Day, in a brief collision that makes the emotional and social divide between the families impossible to ignore. The Barbers had gone looking for the ordinary comfort of shopping together; instead, they find themselves standing across a checkout line from Dan and Joan Rifkin, the parents of Ben Rifkin, whose murder has led to Jacob’s prosecution. Laurie tries to reach out, but Joan rejects her and calls the Barbers murderers. The family leaves without its groceries, carrying the encounter back into the weeks before trial as a sharp reminder that Jacob’s continued presence and the Rifkins’ bereavement cannot be reconciled by a simple gesture of sympathy.
Background: Ordinary life under scrutiny
The encounter takes place against the Barbers’ effort to control how their family appears in public. Andrew avoids Whole Foods because he fears that being seen at an expensive shop might suggest that the family is taking Jacob’s case lightly. He is conscious that newspaper coverage, rumor, or even an unflattering impression could affect prospective jurors. The family wants to be seen as shattered because, in Andrew’s account, it is shattered; behaving as if life were normal risks being read as indifference to Ben’s death.
But on this evening, just before Labor Day, the Barbers are hungry, short on time, and weary of their own vigilance. Newton has emptied out for the holiday, and the relative quiet allows the family to shop together. The date and circumstances matter: this is not a public appearance arranged to make a point, but a small lapse in the constant caution imposed by the prosecution and the approaching trial.
A moment of family normality
Inside the store, the Barbers briefly resemble the family they were before Jacob’s case consumed their life. Laurie plans the meal and manages the shopping; Andrew picks up items on impulse; Jacob wants something to eat before they reach the register. They stroll through the aisles and joke about the organic foods. At the cheese counter, Jacob makes a joke about the smell of a strong Gruyère and the possible consequences of eating too much. All three laugh—not because the joke is remarkable, Andrew explains, but because Jacob has made a joke at all.
That small return of Jacob’s familiar presence feels especially striking after a summer in which he has become silent and difficult for his parents to read. For a moment, the family can see their son rather than the figure others take him to be. Their laughter does not erase the case, but it briefly suspends the public image of the accused family and lets them experience themselves as shoppers again.
The two families meet
The ease ends when the Barbers reach the checkout area. The five of them are close together: Laurie and Andrew at their cart, Jacob just behind them, and Dan Rifkin in the neighboring line only a few feet away. Andrew notices him first and quietly tells Laurie. Dan initially has not seen them; when he does, he and Joan stare. The narrator stresses the imbalance that the encounter makes visible: three Barbers stand before two Rifkins, one family with its son still present and the other bereaved of its son. Jacob’s survival, from the Rifkins’ perspective as Andrew understands it, makes the Barbers’ presence feel profane.
The shoppers and checkout lines continue around them, but the five remain momentarily fixed in mutual silence. Andrew decides not to speak unless the Rifkins begin; he cannot imagine a remark that would not be painful, tactless, or provocative. He asks Jacob to wait in the car and tells Laurie to go with him, intending to pay for the groceries himself. Laurie, however, wants to approach Joan. Andrew sees her impulse as an expression of her faith in communication and her belief that the case has brought suffering to both families, even though their losses are profoundly different.
Laurie’s gesture and Joan’s response
Laurie moves toward Joan despite Andrew’s attempt to stop her. She extends her hands, palms up, as if offering to take Joan’s hands or signaling that she does not know what to say and poses no threat. Joan crosses her arms. Dan lifts an arm slightly, appearing ready to hold Laurie back if necessary. Laurie begins to address Joan, but Joan spits at her and calls the Barbers murderers.
The gestures make the failed encounter starkly legible. Laurie approaches with open hands, seeking some form of contact or expression of sympathy; Joan responds by closing herself off and rejecting the Barbers’ attempt to share the moment. Andrew wipes no slate clean and makes no counterclaim. He places a hand on Laurie’s shoulder, apologizes to Dan, takes Laurie’s hand, and guides her out, repeating quiet apologies as they pass other shoppers and their carts. The account presents Joan’s hostility not as an occasion for Andrew to return hatred, but as an expression of grief within a situation neither family can easily endure.
Aftermath and significance
The family leaves its groceries behind. Laurie notices that they have not bought anything, and Andrew says they do not need it. Outside in the parking lot, away from the store, the Barbers return to the semi-anonymity they still possess in the final weeks before trial and what Andrew calls the coming deluge. The escape is limited: it offers distance from the immediate confrontation, not a solution to the case or the families’ opposing realities.
The encounter gives physical form to a conflict that Andrew’s legal and public caution cannot manage. He has feared being seen shopping because appearances might shape the jury’s view; now the store becomes the place where the opposing family sees them directly. Laurie’s wish to communicate and Andrew’s decision to withdraw are different responses to the same impossible meeting. The Rifkins’ accusation closes off the shared misfortune Laurie hopes to acknowledge, while the Barbers’ departure leaves the accusation unanswered. The moment’s ordinary details—the cart, the checkout line, the unfinished shopping—make the rupture all the more consequential: even a family errand cannot remain separate from Ben’s murder and Jacob’s impending trial.